1、Overview
The Sinotruk Howo A7 and Volvo FH16 are two popular choices for long-haul transportation in the heavy-duty truck market. Both offer solid capabilities, but they differ in performance, comfort, and price. Here’s a comparison to help you choose the best truck for your needs.
-
Choose Sinotruk Howo A7 if:
- You have a tight budget.
- You operate in regions where SINOTRUK has strong service support.
- You prioritize upfront cost savings over long-term performance and comfort.
-
Choose Volvo FH16 if:
- You need superior performance, comfort, and safety for long-haul operations.
- You are willing to invest in a higher-quality, more reliable truck.
- You operate in regions with strong Volvo service networks.
For most long-haul operations, the Volvo FH16 is the better choice due to its advanced technology, comfort, and reliability. However, the SINOTRUK HOWO A7 can be a cost-effective alternative for buyers with budget constraints.
2、Engine Performance
Performance and Engine Power
- Sinotruk HOWO A7:
- Typically equipped with a WD615 or MC11 engine, offering power outputs ranging from 280 to 540 HP.
- Suitable for heavy loads but may lack the refinement and efficiency of European engines.
- Fuel efficiency is decent but not as optimized as Volvo’s engines.
- Volvo FH16:
- Powered by Volvo’s D16K engine, delivering 550 to 750 HP, making it one of the most powerful trucks in its class.
- Advanced fuel injection and turbocharging technologies ensure excellent fuel efficiency and performance.
- Better suited for long-haul with heavy loads due to its superior torque and power delivery.
Winner: Volvo FH16 (for higher power, efficiency, and reliability).
Key Differences
| Specification | Volvo FH16 | Sinotruk Howo A7 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 550 hp to 780 hp | 340 hp to 460 hp |
| Displacement | 16L to 17L | 11.6L |
| Emissions Compliance | Euro 6 | Not specified |
| Engine Brake Power | VEB+ engine brake, 578 hp | Not specified |
In conclusion, while the Sinotruk Howo A7 performs well for mid-range power needs, the Volvo FH16 excels with its higher power, torque, and advanced features, making it a better choice for demanding long-haul operations.
3、Transmission and Drivetrain
Sinotruk Howo A7 Transmissionhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CxmFMI7IysI
- Transmission Type: The Howo A7 uses a 10-speed manual transmission from SINOTRUK’s HW series.
- Main Transmission: It has a double counter shaft, which makes it more durable.
- Auxiliary Transmission: The truck features a planetary reduction system, adding extra gear ratios.
- Clutch: It uses a Φ430 diaphragm spring clutch, hydraulically controlled with air assist for smoother shifting.
Volvo FH16 Transmissionhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CGpG0VhuPsM
- Transmission Type: The Volvo FH16 comes with a 12-speed I-Shift automated manual transmission, making it easier to use.
- Crawler Gears: The system includes crawler gears, which help with slow-speed operation, perfect for tricky maneuvers.
- Transmission Ratio: The Volvo’s system offers a transmission ratio of up to 32:1 forward and 37:1 in reverse, which is especially useful on tough terrains.
- Engine-Transmission Integration: The Volvo transmission is designed to work closely with the engine, improving performance and fuel efficiency.
Key Differences
| Transmission Type | Howo A7 vs Volvo FH16 |
|---|---|
| Transmission Type |
|
| Gear Count |
|
| Advanced Features |
|
| Performance Metrics | Howo A7 vs Volvo FH16 |
| Max Torque |
|
The Volvo FH16 packs a punch with its strong torque and advanced transmission. It provides a smoother ride and great fuel efficiency. But sometimes, keeping things simple is better. I can see why drivers in tougher areas might prefer the Sinotruk Howo A7’s manual transmission. It’s not about extra features; it’s about reliability and easy maintenance—things that matter when you’re on the road for long hours. The Howo A7 feels like the truck that understands you, making things simple when you need it the most.
4、Cab and Comfort Features
- Sinotruk Howo A7:
- Offers a spacious cab with basic amenities, but the build quality and materials may not match European standards.
- Suspension and noise insulation are adequate but not exceptional for long-haul comfort.
- Volvo FH16:
- Known for its luxurious and ergonomic cab design, with options for high-roof sleeper cabs.
- Superior noise insulation, air suspension, and adjustable seats ensure driver comfort on long journeys.
- Advanced climate control and infotainment systems enhance the driving experience.
Winner: Volvo FH16 (for superior comfort and driver-focused design).
In conclusion, the Volvo FH16 offers excellent comfort, advanced features, and spacious living arrangements, making it a top choice for long-haul drivers. The Sinotruk Howo A7, while providing adequate comfort, is a more basic and affordable option.
5、Technology and Safety Features
- Sinotruk Howo A7:
- Basic safety features like ABS and EBD are standard, but advanced driver-assistance systems (ADAS) are limited.
- Lacks the advanced telematics and connectivity options found in European trucks.
- Volvo FH16:
- Equipped with Volvo Dynamic Steering, Adaptive Cruise Control, Lane Keeping Assist, and Collision Avoidance Systems.
- Advanced telematics and fleet management systems for better operational efficiency.
- Focus on safety and reducing driver fatigue.
Winner: Volvo FH16 (for cutting-edge technology and safety features).
While the Volvo FH16 leads with active safety systems, the Howo A7 focuses on passive safety with its reinforced cab and basic features. For long journeys, the Volvo’s advanced technologies provide a higher level of safety, especially at night or on extended trips.
6、Fuel Efficiency and Environmental Impact
1. Sinotruk Howo A7
- Fuel Efficiency:
- Decent fuel efficiency for its class, but not as optimized as European trucks.
- Lacks advanced fuel-saving technologies like predictive cruise control or eco-driving modes.
- Environmental Impact:
- Meets basic emission standards (e.g., Euro III or Euro IV in some models).
- Higher emissions compared to Volvo due to less advanced engine technology.
2. Volvo FH16
- Fuel Efficiency:
- Excellent fuel efficiency thanks to advanced engine technology, aerodynamic design, and features like I-See predictive cruise control and Eco Roll.
- Optimized for long-haul operations to reduce fuel consumption.
- Environmental Impact:
- Complies with stringent emission standards (e.g., Euro VI).
- Lower emissions due to advanced exhaust after-treatment systems and efficient combustion.
Conclusion
- The Volvo FH16 is significantly better in terms of fuel efficiency and environmental impact, making it a more sustainable choice for long-haul operations.
- The Sinotruk Howo A7 is less efficient and eco-friendly but may suffice for buyers with budget constraints or in regions with less strict emission regulations.
7、Price and Value
Sinotruk Howo A7
- Lower Purchase Cost: New Sinotruk Howo A7 models are priced between $50,000 to $80,000, which is 30-50% less than the Volvo FH16.
- Used Options: You can find used A7 trucks for $20,000 to $40,000.
- Attracting Small/Medium Businesses: The lower cost makes the Howo A7 an appealing option for small or medium-sized businesses and emerging markets.
- Basic Features: It includes essential features like adjustable seats, air conditioning, and telematics, but lacks some advanced comfort options seen in premium models.
- Fuel Efficiency: Newer models show a 10% improvement in fuel efficiency, leading to better long-term savings.
- Higher Maintenance: Maintenance costs may rise due to more frequent servicing needs.
Volvo FH16
- Premium Pricing: The Volvo FH16 is much more expensive, with new models priced between $130,000 and $200,000+.
- Used Options: A used FH16 typically costs between $80,000 and $120,000, depending on its age and condition.
- Long-Term Savings: While the initial cost is higher, the better fuel efficiency and lower maintenance costs help save money over time.
- Advanced Features: It includes top safety features like Volvo Active Driver Assist and powerful features like the D16 engine (750 HP, 3550 Nm torque), along with ergonomic comfort options.
- Fuel Efficiency: The FH16 offers 7-10% better fuel savings compared to its predecessor, contributing to long-term savings.
- Resale Value: Volvo’s strong reputation for reliability ensures a higher resale value over time.
Value Considerations
- Short-Term Affordability vs. Long-Term Value: The Sinotruk Howo A7 offers better short-term affordability, but the Volvo FH16 provides superior comfort, safety, and performance over the long run, making it a more valuable choice.
- Fuel Efficiency Gap: The fuel efficiency gap is closing as Sinotruk improves its technology.
- Brand Reputation: Volvo’s strong brand reputation and higher resale value make it a more attractive option in most markets.
8、Conclusion
When choosing between the Sinotruk Howo A7 and the Volvo FH16 for long-haul trucking, it all comes down to performance, comfort, safety, and budget.
Volvo FH16: Top Performance, Comfort, and Safety
The Volvo FH16 stands out with its high-performance features. It offers engine options up to 750 hp and 3550 Nm torque. It also includes fuel-saving technologies like I-See and the I-Shift transmission, which improve fuel efficiency over long distances. The truck’s Volvo Dynamic Steering system enhances safety, and its ergonomic cab ensures comfort during long hours on the road. With better noise insulation and strong reliability, it’s built for tough operations. But this comes with a higher price, ranging from €128,100 to €204,830.
Sinotruk Howo A7: Reliable and Affordable
The Sinotruk Howo A7 offers a more budget-friendly option for businesses aiming to cut initial costs. With engine options up to 440 hp and 2100 Nm torque, it provides dependable performance, though not as powerful as the Volvo FH16. Its design is simpler, making it easier to maintain, and it includes essential features like air conditioning and adjustable seats. The Howo A7 is 30-40% cheaper than the Volvo, making it a good choice for businesses focused on affordability over luxury features.
In conclusion, if you’re after top performance, comfort, and safety, the Volvo FH16 is the way to go. But if you need a cost-effective solution with reliable performance, the Sinotruk Howo A7 is the better pick, especially when budget is the main concern.
